In this blog post I will analyze four, two credible and two not credible, comments left on an article talking about how the bad press that Uber experienced, caused some of their customers to return to using traditional taxicabs for transportation.
"After a spater of bad press for Uber, some turn back to traditonal taxicabs." |
This particular
comment seems to be expressing a little bit of fear. However, this fear isn’t
fear for himself rather its fear for the company. He seems to really believe in
the company and is more worried for how the company is being perceived in a negative way, when its offering what he believes is a good service. This fear
is seen through the slight annoyed tone when he describes the generalizations.
All the facts and statistics he provides shows that he really believes in what
he is talking about, and how ill-perceived this company is with all the bad press.
Beliefs and Values?
I think this commentator,
Too Tall Tech, believes in logic and statistics, from all the stats and
evidence he is providing. He seems generally upset that a good company’s reputation is being tarnished by bad press when the numbers show that the company’s
drivers are better than cabs. I think he believes that good work should be
rewarded, and I think he believes that the company is not getting all the
credit it deserves.
Why is this commentator credible?
From all the statistics that is provided in the comment, it appears that Too Tall Tech has formed his conclusions based on evidence, not necessarily just emotions. Also, his tone
throughout the whole comment stays relatively calm, although towards the end
it picks up on the annoyance and sarcasm a little.
"After a spate of bad press for Uber, some turn back to traditional taxicabs." |
Fear and Anxiety or Fantasy and Wish?
This commentator seems to be expressing more of a
fantasy in describing his experience with Uber. In his description of Uber, he
has lots of praise for the company and he is more direct and to the point. Whereas
in describing his experience with taxi cabs in NYC, there is a lot more
adjectives to describe the negatives of the taxis. There is a annoyed almost exasperated
tone in the comment. And these difference between the two experiences makes the
Uber description almost fantasy-like in contrast to the less than pleasant taxi
ride.
Beliefs and Values?
I think Rob Walker believes that as a customer, he
has the right to be treated with respect as he is paying for the service. I
think he values cleanliness and that he is getting the best service for his
money. I think he values these qualities as these are the complaints that he
had when talking about the NYC cabs.
Why is this commentator credible?
Rob seemed to be a credible commentator on the Uber
experience as he has been a customer for more than a year. Therefore, he has
repeated experience and he liked the service enough to keep using it. However, I
do believe his assessment of the NYC cabs is a little biased because he enjoys
Uber.
Non Credible Comments
|
Fear and Anxiety or Fantasy and Wish?
Timages113, the commentator seems to be expressing some anxiety
in the amount and type of bad press that Uber has to deal with. This particular
commentator seems slightly exasperated by the claims in the article, and the
first sentence of the essay immediately attacks the writer.
Beliefs and Values?
I think Timages113 like the
commentators above values evidence. As the lack of evidence in the article is
what Timages113 comments on and is unhappy with.
Why is this commentator not credible?
Timages113 seems like an
untrustworthy commentator because he resorts to immediately insulting the author of
the article. Also, the content of his comment focuses only on disagreeing with
the article, but he fails to supply any evidence or support as to why he
disagrees with the article.
|
Fear and Anxiety or Fantasy and Wish?
I think Chauncy is expressing a wish or fantasy to deal with
his discontent with Uber. He seems to be expressing a fantasy because of the irrelevance
of his comment. He uses a career in a completely different field to emphasize
his disbelief in the drivers’ ability.
Beliefs and Values?
The beliefs of Chauncy are difficult to pinpoint because of
the vagueness of his comment. However, it seems like Chauncy values people who
are skilled in the position that they work in, as that appears to be what he is
unsatisfied with.
Why is this commentator not credible?
Chauncy Williams appears like a not credible commentator because his comment is supported by no facts, he mentions nothing of the
content of the article, and the only opinion he presents is directly insulting
other people, in particular the Uber drivers.
Reflection
After reading Morgan and Isabel's post I think I have added more ways to evaluate comments. Morgan's commentators seemed to express incredibly strong emotion, and telling if their emotional is rational or not is very important in deciding how reliable to source is.
Isabel's not credible commentators had long, fantasy-like tales and I think like Morgan said in her rationales, these fantasies were fictitious and added to the unreliability of the comment.
After reading Morgan and Isabel's post I think I have added more ways to evaluate comments. Morgan's commentators seemed to express incredibly strong emotion, and telling if their emotional is rational or not is very important in deciding how reliable to source is.
Isabel's not credible commentators had long, fantasy-like tales and I think like Morgan said in her rationales, these fantasies were fictitious and added to the unreliability of the comment.
I think you chose a really interesting article, and I think that it is interesting that many of the comments were supporting Uber. I have seen the same types of commenters (the off-topic ones are the most interesting to read) and have some of the same conclusions as you. I thought it was intelligent when you mentioned that when the commenter attacks the specific article/person it taints their credibility.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you in that people with personal experience or a background with the company facing the controversy have more credibility. Also, going off topic (the commenter who mentioned working for mcdonalds) takes away credibility from the commenter. You seem to have a good concept of credibility when analyzing the comments.
ReplyDelete