Saturday, October 17, 2015

Revised Conclusion

In this post I will include a link to my essay with the conclusion paragraph I have revised. Because I did not write a conclusion paragraph for my original draft, I have only included one link and this paragraph is definitely an improvement from my original conclusion paragraph. In my conclusion paragraph I tried to apply the "So What" approach. I think this conclusion paragraph is still very rough, but it still heads in the direction where I think the conclusion should end up.

McPhee, Nic. "2008-1-26 (Editing a paper)-31" 1/26/2015 via Flickr.
CC BY-SA 2.0 License. 

Revised Conclusion:
The text written by Chris Mooney, “Why the Scientific Case Against Fracking Keeps Getting Stronger,” has been evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the article’s argument. The argument presented is targeted towards political environmentalists and for its specific audience the text provides a very compelling argument. While the text utilizes some rhetoric strategies it still present an article that remains relatively unbiased. Because of the lack of bias this article has become a source that can influence someone like an engineer without having to worry about a conflict of ethics.


No comments:

Post a Comment